
The issue goes way beyond Bush's decision to invade Iraq in the middle of the war in Afghanistan. U.S. government literally broke down during the Bush years. The interagency process was destroyed as Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld set up what was effectively a "black" alternative government (the veep's shadow national security council, and Doug Feith's Office of Special Plans at the Pentagon). The White House treated its coequal branch, Congress, like an interloper (to the annoyance of Republicans as well as Democrats). Junk science infected the policy-making apparatus on key issues of importance to our allies in Europe and Asia, like global warming. Junk legal reasoning by White House and Justice Department lawyers was used to publicly justify torture, decimating our once high moral stature around the world...
Is America truly in decline or is this just another cycle? If the country is waning the questions are many. Did we do it to ourselves or has it been an inevitable buildup and convergence of external forces, or both?
The debate continues…
Your reasoning seems to be flawed. Junk science indeed, there was a short period when the earth warmed minutely and has since leveled off for the past nine years. No evidents of it being man made, a hoax for sure.
You remark that the Bush administration "broke down" ,although I disagree, it was difficult to accomplish much with the likes of Pelosi, Ried, Shumer, Durbin, and the rest of the obstructionist.
I'm wondering what allies you are referring to in Europe?
I can't name one instance of torture, can you?
Stranger2315
They're not my comments, or necessarily even my opinion. Perhaps it would be helpful to read the article first.
I can name several instances of torture. besides for the shiek which we admit to.
global warmign hasn't leveled off the past 9 years.. in actually the only way you can get a level trend is by takign the climate in 6 year slices
there is tons of evidence it is man made. But unless you are willing to even read articles we cant start a debate.
the dems have only had a marginal majority since 06.. the past 12 years have been gop.
as for obstructionist.. tell me why every single republicains voted for mothers day and then had a proceedure revote and every single one voted no.. just to waste time in congress.
talk about obstructionist.. how about tuirning off run and checkign out the real news.
To me it is more a case of a mistake that was made 40 years ago. When at the peak of American technology and might we turned away from technology in order to "solve our social problems here" by wasting trillions of dollars on programs that history shows have failed time and time again.
If we had continued spending the amount of money on space that we were in 1968 we would not have an energy problem, a resource problem, or a current account problem. We quit investing in the future and that that we are in that future, it is these same type of investments that will get us out of the problems that we have.
Your reasoning seems to be flawed. Junk science indeed, there was a short period when the earth warmed minutely and has since leveled off for the past nine years. No evidents of it being man made, a hoax for sure.
I'm afraid you're the one with the flawed reasoning, stranger. You need to turn off Fox News, and stop listening to self-serving morons like Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, and Michael Savage. Probably 95% of real scientists, not those flacks for Exxon-Mobil, believe global warming is real. Even the Dumbo-in-Chief, George Bush, yesterday blamed global warming for the problems faced by the polar bears.
You remark that the Bush administration "broke down" ,although I disagree, it was difficult to accomplish much with the likes of Pelosi, Ried, Shumer, Durbin, and the rest of the obstructionist.
Bush had a Republican controlled Congress for 6 years, and still couldn't do anything right, or get anything accomplished. He lied his way into an unnecessary war in Iraq, and because of his incompetent leadership, that has turned into a political, humanitarian, and economic disaster for this country and for the Iraqis, who were much better off under a madman like Saddam Hussein than they are under the present madman controlling their fate for the last 5+ years.
I can't name one instance of torture, can you?
Ever heard of Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo, Stranger? You need to begin reading the news, and stop basing your viewpoints on right wing sound bytes:
When at the peak of American technology and might we turned away from technology in order to "solve our social problems here" by wasting trillions of dollars on programs that history shows have failed time and time again.
care to elaborate what programs started 40 years ago? and please show when they failed. as well as the trillion dollars.
welfare, social security and other programs started int eh 30's
and FYI "type" should be "types" as that is proper grammar.. Perhaps you'll learn one day to quit throwing stones, but I doubt it.
I can name several instances of torture.
Of course you're correct JoulesBeef. To me, the idea that America hasn't engaged in torture smacks of a perspective that is totally divorced from even a semblance of reality. What seems to have changed during the Bush years is the mind-boggling arrogance/ideology that unapologetically insists: if the cause is right any and all means are justified.
the dems have only had a marginal majority since 06.
Indeed. Another fact that conservative pundits and their supporters continually leave out of their commentaries. I don't have empirical evidence as to how many Republican filibusters or filibuster threats (does anyone have stats?) have occurred since '06, but the weak Democratic majority in the Senate has clearly been an issue as regards any initiative aimed at changing the nation's course.
I would add only that, as a moderate liberal, I haven't been especially impressed with Reid's or Pelosi's performance to date.
care to elaborate what programs started 40 years ago? and please show when they failed. as well as the trillion dollars.
welfare, social security and other programs started int eh 30's
and FYI "type" should be "types" as that is proper grammar.. Perhaps you'll learn one day to quit throwing stones, but I doubt it.
Joulsey
Check the U.S. government official numbers for poverty. From 1959 till 1969 it fell from 22.7% to 12.1%. Since 1969 that rate has stayed about the same, with it being 12.3% in 2005, the last year that they have records.
While welfare and Social Security started in the 30's the Johnson administration is credited with putting into place the structure in the federal budget that dramatically increased spending on social programs in order to win the "war on poverty" which is an unwinnable war.
Investing in technology on the other hand, creates jobs, provides the conditions that incentivises people to get an education to take advantage of the job opportunities, which eliminates the need for the social programs. The government is a macro investor for the long term good of the nation and the people. It is well known that venture capital has a requirement for a 3-5 year payback period and even long term capital investments by corporations require a 20 year payback period. Governments on the other hand should look up to 100 years in the future for their investments. This is what Lincoln did with the "National Railroad", what Roosevelt did (Teddy) with the Panama Canal, and what Eisenhower did with the Interstate and Defense Highway system.
It is not really complicated when you break it down.
Hey Frank, where 'ya been? I was beginning to wonder if my mouthwash had stopped working! Let me guess, you're pissed at me because I'm a Hillary supporter? Not to worry—I'll be voting for Obama, if the price is right that is. :)
Probably 95% of real scientists, not those flacks for Exxon-Mobil, believe global warming is real.
Yep—don't forget about our government's stance on the issue as well: Climate Expert Says NASA Tried to Silence Him I never cease to be amazed at people (large numbers of them) who continue to cling to their beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence. That Creationism, ID and global warming are still debatable to a statistically significant portion of the population, is a little scary to me.
He lied his way into an unnecessary war in Iraq, and because of his incompetent leadership, that has turned into a political, humanitarian, and economic disaster for this country and for the Iraqis, who were much better off under a madman like Saddam Hussein than they are under the present madman controlling their fate for the last 5+ years.
Well, to Hell with electricity, clean water, functioning schools/hospitals and streets and markets that don't blow up! We've brought the good people of Iraq, and the region, the many benefits of Democracy and wholesome capitalism.
I can't name one instance of torture, can you?
Ever heard of Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo, Stranger? You need to begin reading the news, and stop basing your viewpoints on right wing sound bytes:
Now Frank, let's not get hysterical. Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo are clearly NOT examples of torture—just ask the Department of Justice.
I think I'm suffering from a mild case of Newsvine burnout. I haven't seeded anything for more than a week, and haven't been spending as much time here as I used to. I've been through this before, and I'm sure I'll get back in the mood soon.
Hey, I didn't know you were a Hillary fan. I have no problem with those who support Hillary, or even McCain. I just think they're misguided, and that Obama offers more hope for implementing serious, positive changes. I'll vote for Hillary if she somehow manages to grab the nomination.
I have been meaning to say something about that breath of yours though, bf. :^)
I think I'm suffering from a mild case of Newsvine burnout.
Yep, reaching that point.
We have to consider that there is a dialog going on between the rulers and the ruled. They tend to reinforce and reaffirm each other. Though I can offer no proof of this: I do not think a man like Bush would have been electable anywhere else. I did not follow the 2000 presidential election, I just read a few reports and listened to George W. Bush for five minutes. My impression was extremely negative. I thought him a populist, articulating that which the latest poll told him to say. Yet, he was elected (voted in by the Supreme Court, I should say).
The ideas he represented, poll or no poll, was what you wanted to hear at the time. The seeds of self-destruction exist within America. Those seeds exist within other societies, too. Just not so readily apparent. The participant above, stranger2315, is a symptom of what is ailing America, the price you are paying for diversity. When such a one appears, good people go elsewhere. Obstructionist? A case of the pot calling the kettle black, I should think.
Erik
Your entire post is symptomatic of people that continue to only see the world through their self made lenses. Yes we definitely have a kettle here.
better to see through your self made lenses than to walk life blind through the lenses of your party without any thought of your own.
Check the U.S. government official numbers for poverty. From 1959 till 1969 it fell from 22.7% to 12.1%. Since 1969 that rate has stayed about the same, with it being 12.3% in 2005, the last year that they have records.
Spaceguy--While there is merit to your argument, you need to be careful with statistics. The "poverty" calculation is increasingly viewed as being impacted more by political factors than those associated with reporting accuracy.
what Roosevelt did (Teddy) with the Panama Canal…
I would have to say his exploits in Panama were not some of TR's best moments.
Ex-President ROOSEVELT was uncommonly frank in his address at the Charter Day exercises of the University of California. He openly, and even boastfully, admitted that the despoiling of Colombia of her most precious province, Panama, was his own personal act. We quote Mr. ROOSEVELT'S language…
better to see through your self made lenses than to walk life blind through the lenses of your party without any thought of your own.
Once again there is truth in your words JoulesBeef. But given the problems we face, at some point, the country is going to need to put partisanship aside and come to the realization that rational discourse (i.e. non-hysterical and non-self-serving discussion) as well as compromise is absolutely essential in moving forward.
The Constitution itself was the result of compromise at fundamental levels. That we Americans seem to have lost that critical ability is unsettling.
Had we handled things right, what is now deemed American "decline" could have played out very differently. We will never know, of course. And we won't know for a long time whether the next president can begin the titanic task of raising us up again. All is hardly lost: despite the rise of China and India, and Russia's rumblings, there is still no credible rival to superpower status. But let's not kid ourselves about the cause of our problems.
I think he's right - I've thought these things for years, I'm just glad to see people saying these things in Newsweek instead of CommonDreams (meaning many people are reading it). I think it is very unfortunate that any talk like this during the lead-up to the Iraq war was deemed un-patriotic or pandering to terrorists. As a nation, we really do need to step back and look at what led us to this state.
He's also right on the point that 'the government is broken'. What in the world can we do to fix it, though? Is it fix-able? Any thoughts?
Yes, it is indeed broken. The Founders could not envision a power so great that it owned the three branches of power. That fourth power doesn't need lobbyists any more. They are totally inside, looking out. You don't even understand how huge they are, I don't understand it either.
You think a man's worth is the money he has in his pocket. (You may pay lip service to the idea that it is not) A man with a million is ten times more valuable, ten times smarter than a guy with just a hundred thousand dollars. You Americans have let yourself be seduced by the jingle in the pocket. I tell you, rich men are not wise. They can be, but there is no rule, usually they just know about money.
The other day - on another thread - people were laughing at the idea that there should be plumbers in government. We Norwegians had just that - plumbers, carpenters, welders and they did pretty darn well. Stayed in power for 28 years. That will never happen in the USA - you think it's communism or something, but it isn't, it real democracy. You still have more carpenters than billionaires in the US, don't you?
Leah
It is absolutely fixable. We need to toss out the self absorbed baby boomers who know nothing, have learned nothing, but want everything.
He's also right on the point that 'the government is broken'. What in the world can we do to fix it, though? Is it fix-able? Any thoughts?
Not, IMO, if there isn't a profound sea-change in both our attitudes and priorities. While I clearly don't have the IQ to come up with all of the solutions, one thing is certain—we can't keep traveling the same path that we have been so far. I also think that solving the problems the country faces will take heroic effort as well.
A man with a million is ten times more valuable, ten times smarter than a guy with just a hundred thousand dollars.
Hey Erik—I'm not sure that the problems are because the wealthy are10 times smarter (although they are apparently seen as more valuable). While I don't begrudge an individual the right to prosper, it does appear that the super-rich tend to be "10 times more" self-serving.
Yes! For generations Americans broke their backs to ensure that their kids would live a better life than themselves. This kind of determination and perseverance, and sense of self worth, has been at the core of the American story of success.
I am certain and quite devastated though, that I think that this attitude is severely lacking and sometimes absent from the minds of newer generations. The generations before us were so successful at ensuring a comfortable lifestyle that, although recently the poorer classes have been suffering, the current youth have experienced a level of nurture and comfort unprecedented in the world. (everyone thinks they can live in "The Hills")
As an effect of this phenomena, I think Americans are losing touch with what really makes America a great place to live. Quick money, and the ROCK STAR lifestyle, filled with glamorous purses and pimped out rides, basted in alcohol and peppered with drugs, is such a great illusion of success that many lower and middle class teens and young adults completely forget that America is built and run by actually "doing things".
Everyone wants a bigger piece of the pie but no one wants to bake it.
In the past, if you wanted to live the life, you likely actually contributed to society by writing a book, inventing something, building up and industry, and etc. Now, however, people get rich by flipping houses, ripping a beat, or dissolving and consolidating industry. The latter of which was infuriating just to type. The more people get paid to do NOTHING, and sometimes to actually regress, GUESS WHAT? There will be less actual THINGS and SERVICES to go around. The dollar will inflate. People will be out of jobs. Oh wait, ITS HAPPENED.
"Can-do" is cliche, but it is really what we need. If you want to get rich, please, and I beg, please do something you think people will actually benefit from. Provide a good or service that didn't exist before. However, in this age, you might not make as much money as if you liquidated a factory. But if everyone actually DID SOMETHING for their community for the money they earned, we would all live a richer lifestyle as a result.
I repeat: Everyone wants a bigger piece of the pie but no one wants to bake it.
Apologies for being mostly off-topic, but the headline stirred up some thoughts
Apologies for being mostly off-topic, but the headline stirred up some thoughts
Not at all Jason. I find your coments both on topic and quite valid. Thanks for sharing.
Yes! For generations Americans broke their backs to ensure that their kids would live a better life than themselves. This kind of determination and perseverance, and sense of self worth, has been at the core of the American story of success.
I am certain and quite devastated though, that I think that this attitude is severely lacking and sometimes absent from the minds of newer generations.
Yes, I agree. Clearly something seems to have changed since WWII. Perhaps it's that more recent generations appear to have an expectation of entitlement that wasn't present in the Greatest Generation.
more recent generations appear to have an expectation of entitlement
This is a huge problem. The U.S. isn't entitled to anything. We have to work for what we get, whether the other guys do the right thing or not. We have to know that things are this way for individuals as well. What our parents or their parents did in the past reflects on us with only the slightest air of significance...the importance of which can be dissolved immediately by a few selfish gestures.
On torture:
In October 2003, during a surprise inspection of Abu Ghraib, the International Committee of the Red Cross discovered Janabi naked, chained, and bruised in a cell in the "hard site" of the prison. He was a so-called "ghost detainee" who was intentionally hidden from the Red Cross on subsequent inspections and held without appearing on the prisoner lists.
The lawsuit – which alleges multiple violations of U.S. law, including torture, war crimes, and civil conspiracy – notes that CACI provided interrogators used at Abu Ghraib and that L-3 employed all translators used there. Stefanowicz was linked to Abu Ghraib abuses in military court martial proceedings and was said to have directed low-level U.S. military personnel in detainee interrogations.
The United States isn't going anywhere. You can take that pretty much any way you like it and it works. It could mean that we're spinning our wheels, or have come to a stop...or it could mean that the United States is going to be here for a long time like England, or France, or China, or Egypt.
The guy is right, our current tapestry of troubles could have been avoided in many ways--and nobody is afraid of Bush any more as evidenced by this, the Olbermann rant, many others before, and even more to come--more brazen attacks on the guy that's headed out the door. Hirsch isn't blaming the people of the U.S. The decline is Bush-admin-flicted.
Bush deserves it but, at this late date, it's not exactly brave. I'm glad people are getting to say these things and there are definitely people who deserve to get in their own personal I-told-you-so. But there are people that were chastised publicly and lost their job for saying or predicting these things back way before Colin Powell went to the UN. They deserve an hour or two of prime-time.
I remember thinking that there must have been some real intelligence (the CIA kind, not the kind that is missing from between the big ears of the President--well, both kinds are missing but...I'm not being brave either), real intelligence that was truly condemning, but couldn't be made public due to the danger it would put our intelligence-gatherers in. There was no way we would attack another country on false premises. I really didn't think that Bush was that brazen or dumb, or evil, or whatever it would take to do that. Surreal.
It seems like almost all of the Bush policies felt wrong at a gut level...financially, environmentally, scientifically, religiously...yep, everything.
Well, he's about to be gone and I don't care what kind of party you belong to or who you're going to vote for. I'm kinda tired of all the negativity and bickering. Whoever we get is going to be better than this guy. We should all be patting each other on the back and thanking whoever we like to thank for that. We can't go any further down or it won't be a decline, it'll be the end. But there's hope because it's almost Summer. Which means November isn't far behind. I feel a little like a schoolkid who is getting ready for Summer, right after Christmas, but it works for me. He's leaving office and I'm pretty happy about it.
It doesn't mean that I see things as peachy or rose-colored or whatever. But if the guy that wrote this article could find a silver lining to the attacks of 911, I don't feel too bad trying to find the upside to the end of the Bush administration...which is nigh my friend...nigh.
jcatom-- I couldn't have said it any better!
If I had to characterize my feelings about the last 8 years, it would be exactly as you wrote: "Surreal"!
The actions of the current administration really do beg the question: "What were (are) they thinking?!!!"
I feel a little like a school kid who is getting ready for Summer, right after Christmas, but it works for me. He's leaving office and I'm pretty happy about it.
You're not alone my friend. You're definitely not alone.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |